No Town Hall Meetings In 4th District?
One Congressman: about $200,000 per year,
Two Senators: about $400,000 per year,
Zero town hall meetings in the 4th district and the election of November 2010: Priceless
Our elected representatives think we are the drive-over district in a fly-over state. They barely acknowledge we exist.
I challenge any one of them to come out of their ivory towers and debate me or any other constitution party candidate on the issues. I know they will not accept my challenge, because if they did, they would have to acknowledge we exist. They would have to acknowledge the people of the 4th district. They would have to defend their “good intentions legislation” with respect to the US Constitution.
Our current representatives are nothing more than overpaid lap-dogs of the lobbyists. They don’t take a position and defend it, they instead take a bad idea and try to sell it. That isn’t working out to well for them right now so they have resorted to calling us mobs, or right wing extremists or worse.
In November of 2010, send a representative you can trust to congress.
Elect the Constitution Party candidate.
VR/
Greg Cowan
Candidate for U.S. Congress 4th district
The Immorality of Government-Mandated Health Care
Dr. Cleveland is Professor of Economics and Finance at Birmingham-Southern College in Alabama.
As America’s politicians debate the issue of health-care reform, one element seems strangely missing from their deliberations: the question of the morality of gov-ernment-mandated health insurance. Is it moral for government to institute such insurance or to force employers to provide it? The current debate assumes that it is. Discussion has centered primarily on how far coverage can be extended, with no effort to defend the morality of mandated coverage.
To examine the morality of the proposed health reform we must ask the following questions: What is the role of government and what are its moral bounds? Also, how do these bounds apply to the current health-care reform debate? If, in this examination, it is discovered that government has no proper authority to insure the availability of goods and services generally, then all health- care reform proposals seeking to establish the provision of health insurance should be rejected.
I Am The Constitution
I Am The Constitution
I was born in pride and passion, and Providence made it clear
That honor, faith and justice came, when I brought freedom here
Today I stand at hearing rooms; I walk down hallowed halls,
’Mid echoes of those patriots who answered freedom call.
I witness every courtroom, I record each choice that’s made
I count the yeas, I count the nays, as every vote’s displayed
I measure every entry.. Amendments, Acts and Bills,
I see the motions on the floor, and actions on the hill
I bow my head in wonder at the founders standing there
Guided by that Governor that kept them in His care
I cry aloud, “Oh God Above! I’m Glorified in frames!
But America ignores my every rule, and my wisdom is profaned!”
I travel down the highways, and dusty country roads
Looking for those minutemen who once stood brave and bold
I see the blood that stained the soil of hidden fields of pain
I shout to all! “Posterity calls! The Constitution is My Name!”
They pervert my laws, promote their cause and never read my lines
They’ve chosen sides with worldwide guides and history’s new designs!
They claim devotion daily, they open “In God’s Name”
But Morning Star and Setting Sun find puppets seeking fame.
My Preamble seeks His Blessings, and establishes my restraints
My freedom’s thrust is man must trust and set truth at the gate!
They cover His commandments, they ignore His golden rule
They remove the words “In God We Trust”…a people God calls fools!
Do they realize our enemy is that one unearthly foe?
We fought before, at Valley Forge, without shoes, in the snow?
We’ve a broken heart, a soul that’s sold…to those who sought for gold…
Our blood cries from the city streets, “Bring Back America’s Soul!”
Our legislatures abound in greed, without “noblesse oblige”
They abandon home and family, and shred the American Dream
Our nation scoffs at those who want to “acknowledge right and wrong”
A country void of righteous choice, sans heart, san soul, sans song.
Our schools and churches acquiesce to fit the choice of few
They hide within the Government guides, and behind the corner pew
The State and County fold their rules, their sovereignty on hold
The Bankers rule, our assets pooled, our passion now grown cold
Today at America’s Portal stands those demagogues and creeds
Our Cornerstone’s clear, but our conscience is seared of Founding Fathers deeds
Their lives, their fortunes, their honor were spoils no man could buy
Follow their acts, take America back or let the Constitution die.
Marilyn Poythress Kansas City, Mo July 2009
Constitution Party Passes 4 Resolutions at National Committee Meeting in Newark
Against Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominee Sotomayor.
Condemning Federal “Bailouts”.
Honoring Alaskan Independence Party.
Opposing Constitution Article V Convention
What’s In Your Wallet?
By Mary Starrett
May 30, 2009
All the talk lately about the GOP being “too far to the right” and needing a makeover to become “more inclusive” has been amusing in a surreal sort of way.
Mitt, Jeb and Colin along with the great preponderance of liberal media types all agree, the Republicans could be so much more “relevant” and maybe even win an election if they’d just stop catering to those dad gum fringe fundy’s who’ve “hijacked” the party.
I’ve been searching high and low for any sign the RNC has kowtowed to the conservatives in the party. I can’t find one. What I did find was a long list of the party’s sellouts of that “right wing” on amnesty, border security, bailouts, spending, guns, abortion, free speech, civil liberties, national sovereignty, industry killers like NAFTA and GATT and the federal takeover of education, to name a few.
Meanwhile, it seems the left is softening toward the GOP because the GOP is softening on the issues. Soft, in this case is not good.
Case in point is one blogger whose entry I thought was particularly telling. She wrote, “I came to regard conservative Republicans as…Nazis. They were not people I wanted to see in my neighborhood or around my children. As pundits like Rush Limbaugh…became more popular, I came to think of conservative Republicans as lepers.”
That’s pretty much how “conservatives” have been characterized by the left, and now, even by their own party. However, the blogger has since come to regard Republicans in a kinder, gentler way. She goes on to say, “I was avoiding Republicans and hoping that whatever was wrong with them would not infect my family and friends. Now…it seems some Republicans are coming to their senses….perhaps they realize that rigid ideology loses elections. Some are trying to strike more reasonable positions…Whatever has gotten into Republicans like Colin Powell…I hope it lasts. Sanity seems to be trying to return to the Republican Party.”
There you have it. One person’s sanity is another’s insanity.
Looking ahead to 2012, some predict another disaster if the Republicans choose a candidate who’s “too conservative” (read too “insane”).
But that’s not likely to happen. There will be no Ron Paul knighting ceremony. The RNC has already chosen its likely contenders and the party faithful are being primed to accept the likes of liberals like Mitt or Jeb come primary time. We, who’ve been so disappointed in the past, know there will be no “conservative” choice offered by the Republican Party. The rhetoric about moving the party to a more “moderate” footing is all about completing the socialization of our Republic once and for all under the guise of being more “centrist.”
Influential conservative author and strategist Richard Viguerie suggests true conservatives stop all financial support of the RNC to choke the party into compliance. Colin Powell recently said “…the nation needs two parties, two parties debating each other.” He’s right. Currently we have one party with one agenda and two names. That means we need a different party to actually have that debate.
Republicans have been leaving the sinking ship en masse. Gallup reports the lowest number of people identifying as Republicans in 26 years.
Even die-hard Democrats are embarrassed by how all the promised “hope” and “change” panned out.
I’d be willing to guess before too long we’ll see even more folks reaching into their wallets and removing the party membership cards that have been weighing them down all these years.
© 2009 Mary Starrett – All Rights Reserved
A Culture Of Surveillance
by Chuck Baldwin
April 28, 2009
It is truly amazing how much news the American news media chooses to ignore. If one wants to discover what is actually going on in the world, he or she often has to go to the foreign press. This has again been the case with a story that every American should be extremely interested in, but which has been totally ignored by the American news media. I found this story in Russia Today.
According to RussiaToday.com, “The personal computer may soon be not-so-private, with the U.S. and some European nations working on laws allowing them access to search the content held on a person’s hard drive.
“President Obama’s administration is keeping unusually tight-lipped on the details, which is raising concerns among computer users and liberty activists.”
The report also states, “In extreme secrecy from the public, the United States is hammering out an international copyright treaty with several other countries and the European Union. Under the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (or ACTA), governments will get sweeping new powers to search and seize material thought to be in breach of copyright. But why all the secrecy?”
Russia Today quotes Richard Stallman, prominent American software freedom activist, as saying, “Democracy gets bypassed and they can do to us whatever they want. I can only guess that it’s going to be nasty, because if it weren’t going to be nasty, they wouldn’t need to keep it a secret.”
The report also said, “Up until now, the breach of copyright has been a civil matter. The Obama administration seems to now want to criminalize it.”
The report continued saying, “Some say modern America is being overtaken by a culture of surveillance.”
A culture of surveillance indeed. What began in earnest under former President George W. Bush is now sharply escalating under President Barack Obama.
According to Ecommerce Journal, President Obama and his Big Brother fellow travelers in Congress are seeking power to “cut the whole world off the Internet.” The report says, “Senators John Rockefeller and Olympia Snowe proposed the Cybersecurity Act that would create the Office of the National Cybersecurity Advisor. Its powers are detailed in the The Cybersecurity Act of 2009.
“If the President so chooses, he can call a ‘cybersecurity emergency’ and shut down or limit any ‘net traffic or a ‘critical’ network ‘in the name of national security,’ though the bill fails to provide concrete definitions on what is ‘critical’ or what constitutes an ‘emergency.’”
The report goes on to say, “This new legislation seeks to give even more power to the government to regulate the Internet and, in future, the possibility to regulate content and usage. What begins as a method of defeating terrorism and protecting telecommunications, can quickly become a method to regulate ‘hate speech’ to assign ‘motive’ or ‘intent’ to harm and even to regulate and legislate the flow of information that is deemed by the ‘thought police’ to be inflammatory or counter-productive to their cause.”
The report says that the new cybersecurity legislation can be a “framework for future, more invasive legislation. It is a first step to the loss of internet privacy, free speech and the free flow of information.”
So, once again, the passing of a Republican Presidential administration and the advent of a Democratic Presidential administration have resulted in zero change in the overall direction of the ship of state. In the name of “national security,” the federal government of this country continues to deepen its commitment to what can only be described as a police-state mentality. And, once again, the national news media in America chooses to ignore the story, and by so doing, shows willful compliance with this disturbing phenomenon.
I wonder how many Obama supporters are paying attention?
During the Bush years, my “conservative” brethren (especially the ones calling themselves Christians) repeatedly turned a blind eye and deaf ear to the myriad foibles and falsehoods, and frequent fraudulence of President Bush because he was a Republican. Now we will see how many Obama supporters will look the other way in order to protect President Obama because he is a Democrat. I suspect most of them will show themselves of no better character than the Bush supporters.
Consider: Obama promised to end the war in Iraq. But what has he done since being elected? He merely moved the major combat theater to Afghanistan. He is even in the process of escalating the war in Afghanistan to possibly include Pakistan. So, where are the “peacenik” liberals who supported Obama? Why do they not loudly proclaim their opposition, as they did when Bush was in office?
Furthermore, Obama criticized Bush’s undisciplined deficit spending, but what has he done since becoming President? He has deeply expanded Bush’s failed financial policy of excessive deficit spending. Again, where are all the loud voices of protest?
George Bush wanted amnesty for illegal aliens. Barack Obama wants amnesty for illegal aliens. George Bush supported the assault weapons ban. Barack Obama supports the assault weapons ban. George Bush wanted to limit the legal rights of certain people charged with crimes. Well, friends, Barack Obama also wants to limit the rights of people charged with crimes.
Just last week, an Associated Press report stated, “The Obama administration is asking the Supreme Court to overrule long-standing law that stops police from initiating questions unless a defendant’s lawyer is present, another stark example of the White House seeking to limit rather than expand rights.
“The administration’s action–and several others–have disappointed civil rights and civil liberties groups that expected President Barack Obama to reverse the policies of his Republican predecessor, George W. Bush, after the Democrat’s call for change during the 2008 campaign.”
So, where are Obama’s supporters who thought they were voting for change? Will they do nothing, as did Bush’s supporters, and accept this abridgment of personal liberty, simply because “their man” is in the White House? Probably.
In addition, George Bush created a Big-Government monster known as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Can there be any doubt that DHS is in the process of manufacturing a ubiquitous surveillance society that eavesdrops, snoops, and monitors virtually our entire lives? And what does Barack Obama do immediately after assuming office? He multiplies and expands the surveillance society to even greater degrees. So again I ask, where are all the Bush critics to denounce Barack Obama’s draconian anti-privacy, anti-freedom policies?
The Internet is the last best source of free and independent information left. Think where the liberty movement would be without the Internet. But even as we speak, President Obama and his allies in Congress are attempting to obtain the authority to censor information on–and curtail access to–the Internet. Plus, in the name of “cybersecurity,” they are plotting to obtain the authority to monitor and seize anyone’s personal computer at will.
The Russia Today report is right: we do have a culture of surveillance. We also have a culture of cowardice by people from both sides of the political aisle who, in the name of partisan politics, are willfully accommodating and facilitating the demise of this constitutional republic.
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/donate.php
© Chuck Baldwin
This column is archived as http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20090428.html
Constitution Party Continues Unprecedented Growth
Phil Jose
Communications Director,
Constitution Party of Missouri
(314) 409-2316
www.constitutionpartymo.org
COLUMBIA MO—Constitution Party members from across Missouri gathered this past Saturday to report on the state of the party in their area. Whether they were from Kansas City, Springfield, St Louis, or points in between, all proudly and excitedly spoke of the same thing—the party has grown by leaps and bounds and is poised to gain even more momentum.
Party leaders are reporting record attendance at local meetings. They’re seeing ever-increasing interest in the party by the general public. Most importantly, they’re seeing people stepping up and stepping into leadership roles—at the congressional district, county, and local levels the party is being organized into a force to be reckoned with statewide.
Every member present agreed that the hard organizational work now being done is only the foundation for a greater goal: to run viable candidates in serious campaigns in 2010 and get them elected.
Although this goal will entail great effort, party members believe that it’s attainable and very necessary. This country is drifting farther and farther away from its constitutionally rooted form of government with encroachments on our freedoms and fiscal irresponsibility. More and more voters will be looking for candidates committed to returning us to government where the rule of law is supreme.
The Constitution Party will be ready for the challenge.
Constitution Party Missouri State Chairman Donna Ivanovich is available for further comment at 314-956-6181 or donnaivanovich@constitutionpartymo.org
Why the “Fair Tax “is Unfair
by Darrell L. Castle
Constitution Party Vice-Chairman
The following explanation is in response to inquiries asking, “Why is the Constitution Party opposed to the “Fair Tax”?
Politicians cannot be trusted to make the Fair Tax a fair tax. This tax could be imposed by a simple act of Congress while formally ending the income tax would require a Constitutional Amendment. Therefore, Congressional nature being what it is, there is a good chance we could end up with both.
Second, the Fair Tax proponents say the tax would start out at 23% but they admit that the real number would be closer to 30%. With a 30% federal sales tax and a state sales tax of 10% as it is in Tennessee, the actual sales tax would be about 40%. That would be an outrageously high tax!
Third, the Fair Tax proposal calls for a rebate of the tax on food and basic necessities to those below the federal poverty level. You can be sure this would create another large federal bureaucracy to manage the rebate.
Finally, the main reason I oppose the Fair Tax is because the correct direct Federal tax on the American people is no tax at all. There is no legitimate reason whatsoever for any direct Federal tax on the American people. My position is easily validated when we examine the actual reason we have a current income tax in the first place. It might surprise you to know that the income tax does not exist primarily to fund the expenses of operating the Federal Government. Instead it exists to pay interest to our central bank which is the Federal Reserve System and to pay interest to the other central banks of the world for the money they create on their computers and then lend to us. This system is unconscionable because it reduces us to the level of medieval serfs working on the estates of the central bankers. Serfs were bound to the estate of the land owners for whom they worked their entire lives. The owner literally owned their labor just as the Federal Government own ours (if you don’t give the fruit of your labor to the Federal Government, men with guns come and get you and put you in jail). The serf usually got to keep about 50% of what his labor produced for his own needs just as we are allowed to keep about 50% of what we produce. The serf’s labor could be sold to others just as our labor is sold to China and other countries to pay the interest on the money the Federal Government borrows from those countries. Our labor represents the minutes, hours, days, months, and years that make up our lives. That is what has been taken from us, not for a legitimate purpose, but to pay interest to central banks. Allow me to explain.
If you look at this year’s budget, you will see that it is approximately $3.6 trillion. The deficit started at $1.2 trillion, is now $2.3 trillion, and is heading for $3 trillion because tax revenue has slowed dramatically. This means the Federal Government will spend at least two-thirds more than it takes in through tax this year alone. The difference must be borrowed from other countries or central banks. The principle and interest must be repaid from tax revenue. That is why the government is obsessed with the collection of taxes. A budget even close to constitutional levels could easily be funded by a small, non-punitive, import tariff.
To purchase goods and services, the American people would be required to pay this tax. Therefore, the Fair Tax is a tax on consumption and is payment extracted from us for permission to live. What it says about us is that we cannot pursue our hopes and dreams without the Federal Government’s permission which is granted by payment of the tax. We cannot feed our families without permission from the Government. Even if the Government rebates the food tax, we must beg (apply) for it. Most importantly, to accept the Fair Tax as something better than the income tax would be to concede the principle that the Federal Government does not have the legitimate right to directly tax us. So, the only fair direct Federal tax is no tax.
The Big Business/Big Government Axis Of Evil
By Chuck Baldwin
April 14, 2009
Self-proclaimed “conservatives” love to tout themselves as ardent supporters of the “free enterprise” system. In the name of “capitalism,” they support any and every piece of legislation or governmental decision that caters to business–especially Big Business. Favorite policies of these folks include anything and everything that calls itself “free trade.” Furthermore, these same “conservatives” will support just about anything and everything that is said to advance the so-called “global economy.”
Needless to say, in the name of “free trade” millions of American jobs and thousands of American manufacturing plants have been outsourced to foreign countries and interests. And leading the charge for “free trade,” outsourcing, and the “global economy” is the international cabal known as Big Business. But Big Business does not play this game alone. Joining Big Business is its pernicious partner, Big Government.
Together, Big Business and Big Government form a tyrannical tandem that is squeezing the breath out of our once-great republic. In fact, people need to understand that what is passing for “capitalism” in America today is nothing more than “Corporatism.”
Corporatism has little to do with genuine capitalism or free enterprise. Freedom and federalism thrive when true capitalism and free enterprise are at work. But Corporatism has nothing to do with freedom and everything to do with tyranny.
Corporatism is the marriage of Big Business with Big Government. Corporatism uses the force and weight of government to create giant monopolies, which strangle competition and freedom. Rules and regulations are enacted that make it impossible for “little” guys to compete. The trade laws of nations are pitted against each other, forcing free nations to sacrifice their own peace and security to accommodate the economies of totalitarian regimes. And, of course, Big Business is the recipient of gargantuan profits in the process.
Please understand that the movers and shakers of Big Business have no national loyalty. They claim no country, salute no flag, and recognize no independence but their own. They are the travel companions of the bloodiest butchers on the planet. They have homes in every corner of the globe and are happy to share the beds of the vilest people on earth. They would gladly sell the heart and soul of America to the highest bidder, and have long ago sold their own hearts and souls to the devil.
And there is no limit to how intimately Big Business and Big Government can collaborate to steal people’s liberties. A classic case in point is the burgeoning effort to control and regulate private, homegrown gardens.
In the face of a growing recession, thousands of people across America are planting and growing their own gardens. And this is not lost to Corporatism. Remember, Corporatism’s great goal is to create monopolies and crush freedom, leaving the cabal controlling both Big Business and Big Government alone atop the world of prosperity and power. Therefore, it will use every tool at its disposal to protect any and all of Corporatism’s favored players. And when it comes to America’s food supply, Big Agriculture is that favored player.
Even as Michelle Obama plants a White House garden and encourages Americans everywhere to do the same thing, her husband is creating a brand new tool for the Big Business/Big Government powerbrokers: a new “Food Safety Administration” (FSA).
At the same time, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Connecticut) has introduced H.R. 875 to “protect the public health.” But it is not the public health that Ms. DeLauro wants to protect. It is the health of the demonic duo of Big Business and Big Government. Two other bills with similar machinations are S. 425, introduced by Senator Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), and H.R. 815, submitted by Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colorado).
In a nutshell, when these bills become law, every homegrown garden in the country will be regulated, inspected, controlled, and taxed by the federal government. (No, I am not making it up.) In addition, small, independent farms would most certainly be put out of business. In effect, the great Nanny State is posturing itself to completely take over the food business in America.
First, the Big Business/Big Government Axis of Evil began taking over the banking and financial institutions. Next, it was the automobile business that was in Corporatism’s crosshairs. Now, it is energy, healthcare, and even the food business–down to the smallest backyard, homegrown garden–that Corporatism is plotting to plunder.
It is an ingenious system: first, Big Government regulates legitimate business to the point that it can no longer function in a free and open market. Then it paves the way for foreign investors to gain influence or even seize control of those same businesses. Then it forces the mergers of smaller entities into international monstrosities. Then it passes laws making it impossible for the remaining small, independent businesses to compete. Meanwhile, the newly created super-wealthy collaborators in Big Business are more than eager to share their bounty with their fellow miscreants inside Big Government.
The obvious result of all this chicanery is the creation of a superior ruling class and the destruction of a free and independent middle class. If all this sounds familiar, it is because Corporatism used to be known by another name: fascism! And this is exactly what is being created right in front of our very eyes, here in the good old U.S.A.
If “conservatives” were more cognizant of and diligent to protect the U.S. Constitution and principles of liberty contained in our Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence, they would be able to see through the façade of modern Corporatism that masks its totalitarian agenda under the guise of “free trade.”
So, in the meantime, go ahead and grow your garden, because you are going to need it. But, at the same time, be prepared to give an account to your local FSA agent. He’ll want to know how much you’ve grown, how much you sold or gave away, and to whom you sold or gave it. He’ll want to inspect it; he’ll expect you to fill out the appropriate government forms, including names, addresses, amounts, prices, etc. And this goes for all those church and social club potluck dinners as well. Oh, yes! He’ll also expect you all to pay taxes on it.
Either that, or convince your State legislators and governor to do what the Thirteen Colonies did: tell King George to go to Hades! But if you don’t have–and cannot get–a State legislature and governor willing to do that, you’ll need to either move or start turning your entire life over to the new fascist America that Big Business and Big Government are creating, because the die has been cast, and it doesn’t appear that there is any going back.
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/donate.php
© Chuck Baldwin
THE RECURRING NIGHTMARE
by Mary Starrett
Constitution Party Communications Director
High school grads who’d like to attend college in another state often can’t unless they can afford to pony up thousands in out-of state tuition. Of course, if said high school grad is an un-convicted felon, it’s a whole different story. Under proposed federal legislation, illegal aliens (these days referred to as undocumented students/immigrants/residents) who wish to attend state colleges and universities would be able to do so without paying the higher out-of state charges.
The so-called DREAM (Development Relief and Education for Alien Minors) Act (HR 1751 and S759) would grant legal status to illegals who came to the US before turning 16 and who have lived here for at least five years; but not before giving him or her a seat in a college classroom that may have been denied to your child.
Under the latest Dream Act, legal status would be available to students who have completed high school, received a Graduate Equivalency Diploma (GED) or have been admitted to an institution of higher education. That status would be valid for up to six years.
Of course, this begs the question we’ve learned not even to ask anymore, “how do those here illegally show up at schools for years without being detected, summarily booted and then deported?”
The DREAM Act is actually a recurring nightmare that’s been haunting us for years. Among those pushing this free ride bill are unions, always on the prowl for future dues-paying members. According to what has been termed the “Hispanosphere” by pro- illegal immigration websites the DREAM ACT is “the bill that won’t go away.”
First introduced in 2000, The DREAM Act’s timing couldn’t be worse. This piece of legislation has support from both parties- reminding us the two parties are no longer distinct but the same on virtually every issue- especially amnesty for illegals. The Act would further bankrupt our colleges and take precious resources away from hard working American citizens and their children. According to the immigration reform group FAIR, the DREAM Act would:
1 – Reward parents who violated immigration laws through their children, and provide a powerful incentive for more illegal immigration.
2 – Transfer seats and tuition subsidies to illegal aliens at a time when state higher education budgets are being slashed, admissions curtailed, and tuitions increased.
3 – By broadly defining “student” it gives amnesty to large numbers of illegal aliens who may be pursing any sort of education.
4 – Accelerate chain migration and exponential population growth because illegal aliens who are granted green cards will be able to petition the Department of Homeland Security in the future to grant their parents and relatives legal status too.
Adding insult to injury, after you, the American taxpayer, have paid thousands per year to educate each of the millions of “undocumented students” through grade school and high school, you would then be asked to subsidize their college tuition.
While “undocumented immigrants” cost Americans more and more money we simply do not have, Hispanic activist groups continue to push the envelope. According to the Associated Press, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), one of many radical groups crying for “equal rights” for the (illegal) Hispanics in this country, has vowed to keep its workshops closed to “Anglos.”
The invitations went out saying races other than Hispanic were not welcome. (Just TRY sending out a notice that said “Whites Only”!) Spelling Bees are being held for children in American public schools in Spanish. Kids who can’t read or write or speak the English language are being given a shot at excelling in their native tongue.
Remember that Republicans and Democrats alike are supporting this piece of legislation. Time is short to let your elected representatives in the House and the Senate know you’re having enough trouble putting your own kids through school, and that this is one DREAM you don’t want to come true.
